Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Former RAF pilot urges tests to show results of drones hitting passenger jets

  • Former BA pilot Steve Landells is calling for drone examinations to be carried out
  • 23 near misses were investigated by the UK Airprox Board in 6 months
  • Flight safety specialist said it appears no examinations on drones have actually been done

Georgia Diebelius For Mailonline

and
Press Association

14

View
comments

An airline pilot is calling for examinations to be carried out to locate just what would certainly happen if a drone hit a passenger jet, amid a recent spate of near misses.

The British Airline Pilots Association (Balpa) wishes the Department for Transport and the Civil Aviation Authority to spine research in to the feasible consequences of such a collision.

Former RAF and British Airways pilot Steve Landells warned that a drone hitting an airliner could result in an uncontrolled engine failure or a smashed cockpit windscreen.

Steve Landells, Balpa's flight safety specialist, said there is a large amount of data on the effects of bird strikes on planes, but he insisted that this is not a true representation of what would happen with a drone because 'birds don't have a big lump of lithium battery in them

Steve Landells, Balpa’s flight safety specialist, said there is a large quantity of data on the effects of bird strikes on planes, yet he insisted that this is not a true representation of just what would certainly happen along with a drone because ‘birds don’t have actually a big lump of lithium battery in them

Some 23 near misses between aircraft and drones were investigated by the UK Airprox Board in merely 6 months according to its latest reports, including 12 given an A rating – meaning there was ‘a serious risk of collision’.

Mr Landells, Balpa’s flight safety specialist, said there is a large quantity of data on the effects of bird strikes on planes, yet he insisted that this is not a true representation of just what would certainly happen along with a drone because ‘birds don’t have actually a big lump of lithium battery in them’.

He said that it is ‘fairly likely’ that the battery of a standard quadcopter drone entering the core of a jet engine would certainly cause an uncontained engine failure.

An uncontained engine failure on a British Airways plane in September saw the aircraft engulfed in flames and smoke as it was taking off in Las Vegas.

An uncontained engine failure on a British Airways plane in September saw the aircraft engulfed in flames and smoke as it was taking off in Las VegasĀ 

An uncontained engine failure on a British Airways plane in September saw the aircraft engulfed in flames and smoke as it was taking off in Las Vegas 

Landells said: ‘You end up along with fairly higher velocity bits of metal going anywhere they like. That could be through fuel tanks, through hydraulic lines and even in to the cabin.

‘Losing the engine is not going to cause an aircraft to crash because they are designed to fly along with one engine down.

‘yet an uncontained engine failure is going to be different every time. That could be fairly serious indeed.’

The Balpa flight safety specialist explained that he wishes testing along with drones to be carried out because it appears none has actually been done before.

He added: ‘The very first thing we want to do is grab a drone or at least the critical portions of a drone flying at a windscreen of an aircraft.

‘The indications so far along with computer modelling are that you’ll end up along with penetration of a windscreen.

‘One opportunity is that the battery smashes the windscreen and the inside layer of the windscreen shatters and you end up along with a lot of glass in the cockpit, probably moving at fairly higher speed.

‘As a pilot, I don’t want to be sitting there as quickly as that’s going on.

‘There’s additionally a opportunity that it might merely bounce off. We don’t know at the moment.’

An airline pilot is calling for tests to be carried out to discover what would happen if a drone hit a passenger jetĀ 

An airline pilot is calling for examinations to be carried out to locate just what would certainly happen if a drone hit a passenger jet 

‘A’ RATED DRONE NEAR MISSES IN UK BETWEEN APRIL AND OCTOBER 2015

Some 23 near misses between aircraft and drones were investigated by the UK Airprox Board in merely 6 months according to its latest reports, including 12 given an A rating – meaning there was ‘a serious risk of collision’. 

April 25

A military Lynx helicopter was forced to conduct an ‘evasive manoeuvre’ to steer clear of hitting a drone over Hambrook, Gloucestershire.

The pilot said the object passed merely one rotor span down the adverse of the helicopter.

June 17

The pilot of an autogyro was on a training flight over Detling, Kent at 1,500 feet as quickly as he encountered a drone.

The aircraft missed the drone by about 20 metres and the pilot assessed the risk of collision as ‘high’.

July 9

Both members of the flight crew on an RJ1 aircraft spotted a drone at an altitude of 4,000 feet over Detling, Kent.

It passed 60 feet below the left wing.

The UKAB concluded that it would certainly have actually been ‘impossible’ for the drone to have actually been flown legally because at that height it could not be seen by an observer on the ground.

July 26

A silver drone passed within two wing lengths of a BE200 aircraft as it was coming in to land at Southampton Airport.

Investigators found that ‘opportunity had played a major part’ in a collision being avoided.

August 11

A Chinook pilot was carrying out a simulated engine malfunction near RAF Odiham, Hampshire as quickly as a quadcopter drone along with an attached camera was seen about 75 feet to its side.

August 27

The pilot of a Dornier Do328 short-haul jet – which typically has actually capacity for about 30 passengers – was at 2,800 feet on the approach to Manchester Airport as quickly as he spotted a bright blue drone.

The UKAB determined that the drone was not permitted to be within that airspace.

September 13

A Boeing 737 experienced a near miss out on along with a drone shortly after taking off from Stansted Airport, Essex.

The incident happened ‘so quickly’ that there was no time to take avoiding action, the pilot said.

September 13

In the skies above the Houses of Parliament a drone came within 20 metres of an Embraer 170 jet on its approach to London City.

The UKAB considered that the drone operator was the cause of the near miss.

September 22

Shortly after a Boeing 777 had taken off from Heathrow Airport a drone narrowly passed down the right hand adverse of the airliner.

Investigators concluded that the drone was at the same height and within 25 metres of the jet.

A report was made to police yet the drone operator was not traced.

September 30

A drone was flown within a few metres of a passenger jet landing at Heathrow.

The pilot of the Airbus A319 stated that the drone may have actually been merely 20 feet above and 75 feet to the left as quickly as it passed by the aircraft.

The jet was flying at an altitude of 500 feet and was on the final approach to the west London airport as quickly as the drone was spotted.

October 2

A Dornier Do328 pilot assessed that there was a higher risk of collision as quickly as a drone passed his left wing by much less compared to 50 feet.

The incident occurred at an altitude of 3,000 feet shortly after take off from Manchester Airport.

October 4

A PA28 light aircraft pilot was flying over Otherton Airfield, Staffordshire as a drone passed concerning 20 feet from his wing-tip.

Landells said the first examinations could cost about £250,000.

Philippa Oldham, head of transport and manufacturing at the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, described the consequences of a drone hitting an airliner as ‘such an unknown thing’ that would certainly depend on a number of factors such as the size and speed of the drone and the location of the collision.

She said: ‘There’s a lot of scenario preparation going on about that at the moment.

‘The impact potentially could be anything from nothing to a destruction of an engine.’

People that fly drones close to planes could be convicted of endangering the safety of an aircraft which has actually a maximum prison sentence of 5 years, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) said.

Former RAF and British Airways pilot Steve Landells warned that a drone hitting an airliner could result in an uncontrolled engine failure or a smashed cockpit windscreen

Former RAF and British Airways pilot Steve Landells warned that a drone hitting an airliner could result in an uncontrolled engine failure or a smashed cockpit windscreen

A CAA spokesman said the regulator has actually a number of ongoing schemes aimed at raising awareness of the safety requirements for using drones, such as its Dronecode campaign.

He added: ‘We are already working alongside the Department for Transport and industry partners to much better understand the potential risks and outcomes of a drone hitting a manned aircraft.

‘Public safety is our very first priority and we are working fairly closely along with the Civil Aviation Authority, industry and airline operators to improve our understanding and knowledge of this emerging technology.

‘It is essential to make sure that clear and proper regulations are in place and we will certainly set out much more details in a Government strategy on the use of drones later this year.’



from Golden Land Travel http://ift.tt/1Uzg6xj

Former RAF pilot urges tests to show results of drones hitting passenger jets Rating: 4.5 Diposkan Oleh: Blog baru

0 komentar:

Post a Comment